mirror of
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep.git
synced 2026-08-09 14:05:53 +00:00
SPC and relationship to GPC (#343)
Simplify privacy opt-out name to SPC. Add material on relationship to GPC: this opt-out is intended to express the same opt-out as GPC, should express the intent of the user, and sites should offer to apply SPC for new users who have turned on GPC. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/343 Co-authored-by: Don Marti <dmarti@zgp.org> Co-committed-by: Don Marti <dmarti@zgp.org>
This commit is contained in:
+22
-11
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ refers to existing OOPSs that have already been documented, and does not propose
|
||||
## Declaring an OOPS
|
||||
|
||||
In order to apply an OOPS to an object, an author MAY set the JSON-LD properties `xRobotsTag` and/or
|
||||
`secGPC`. For example,
|
||||
`SPC`. For example,
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ In order to apply an OOPS to an object, an author MAY set the JSON-LD properties
|
||||
"type": "Note",
|
||||
"content": "Don't surveil me bro",
|
||||
"xRobotsTag": "noai",
|
||||
"secGPC": 1
|
||||
"SPC": 1
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
A recipient SHOULD process the content and metadata of the object as if the recipient had received it
|
||||
over an HTTP connection with the corresponding header.
|
||||
|
||||
* `secGPC`: process as if the object has been received with the `Sec-GPC` HTTP request header.
|
||||
* `SPC`: process as if the object has been received in an HTTP connection with the `Sec-GPC` HTTP request header.
|
||||
|
||||
* `xRobotsTag`: process as if the object had been received with an `X-Robots-Tag` HTTP response header
|
||||
with a value equal to this property.
|
||||
@@ -54,15 +54,23 @@ over an HTTP connection with the corresponding header.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deployment considerations
|
||||
|
||||
The [GPC] standard allows for individuals in an increasing number of
|
||||
jurisdictions to pass a legally binding signal indicating a commonly
|
||||
held privacy norm. However, GPC as an HTTP header only works from
|
||||
client to server, so can only function in centralized systems. A
|
||||
The existing Global Privacy Control ([GPC]) standard allows for individuals in an increasing number of
|
||||
jurisdictions to pass a legally binding opt-out preference signal indicating a commonly
|
||||
held privacy norm. However, GPC is implemented as an HTTP request
|
||||
header, which makes it only works from
|
||||
client to server. This limits the ability of users to pass a privacy opt-out
|
||||
in a federated communications medium. A
|
||||
federated system where a user's information may be passed from
|
||||
one server to another is currently at a disadvantage in serving
|
||||
GPC users, because the GPC does not travel with the information
|
||||
to which it applies. Adding GPC to ActivityPub would bring parity
|
||||
with centralized social sites.
|
||||
users who wish to opt out, because the opt-out preference signal does not travel with the information
|
||||
to which it applies. SPC is intended to have the same effects as GPC, but for
|
||||
cases where the user does not have a direct HTTP connection to the recipient of some personal
|
||||
information. Adding the SPC opt-out to ActivityPub would bring parity with centralized social sites.
|
||||
|
||||
Fediverse instances should make SPC configurable by users, and reflect a user's
|
||||
actual intent to opt out. Fediverse instances should detect when a user has turned on
|
||||
GPC or some other privacy opt-out or setting, and offer to apply SPC to that user's
|
||||
objects.
|
||||
|
||||
Content sharing platforms that operate in a centralized manner
|
||||
are now frequently promoting their support for signaling opt-outs
|
||||
@@ -74,7 +82,10 @@ likely need to also offer an opt out signaling feature.
|
||||
|
||||
## Security considerations
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal depends on compliant processing of the OOPSs by all actors.
|
||||
This proposal depends on compliant processing of OOPSs by all actors.
|
||||
|
||||
Some jurisdictions require privacy OOPSs to be registered in order to have legal effect. In the event this
|
||||
FEP is accepted, the author intends to pursue registration.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementations
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user