mirror of
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep.git
synced 2026-08-08 13:35:51 +00:00
FEP-baf5: authorization, not authentication (#850)
Minor wording fix per silverpill Co-authored-by: Julian Lam <julian@nodebb.org> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/850
This commit is contained in:
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Support for this FEP is indicated by the implementation of [FEP 844e][844e], whe
|
||||
|
||||
This FEP supersedes the same-origin assumption described in [FEP fe34][fe34]. The administrators collection (in conjunction with the [FEP 1b12][1b12] moderator collection if applicable) determines whether a same-origin or cross-origin actor has administrative privilege.
|
||||
|
||||
When verifying the authenticity of a moderation action (such as `Update`, `Delete`, or other object mutations), a receiver SHOULD:
|
||||
When verifying the whether a moderation action (such as `Update`, `Delete`, or other object mutations) is authorized, a receiver SHOULD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Resolve the actor of the activity.
|
||||
1. Verify that the sending instance supports the Administrator Collection (this FEP), as indicated by [FEP 844e][844e]. If the FEP is not advertised, fall back to the standard origin-based security model as defined in [FEP fe34][fe34].
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user